Some years ago an ironical notice in some material about Hyperborea, that it was searched everywhere except as on the Moon, had caught my eye. It has appeared prophetical....
The strange thing - a destiny. Sometimes she plays with us malicious jokes, and at times gives such surprises that a heart with joy is ready to jump out of a chest. Here and with me there was something similar.
I had finished the chapter about separation of the Moon from Earth (the book "Battles of ancient gods") and had gone to look a film about the Moon, to rest a little. And fancy my agitation when less than in a half an hour I had heard that the hypothesis just stated by me received all new and new confirmations. The main from them - equal age of Earth and the Moon (approximately 4,5 billion years), presence on the Moon the same rocks, as on Earth, and availability on the Moon typical earthly elements of relief - mountain ridges and gorges (canyons).
Further - it is more. Having viewed news on the Internet, I had seen a large quantity of pages telling about ostensibly classified as secret by NASA photos of ruins of an ancient city on the Moon, and then photos itself had also appeared to my look.
All it was so interesting that I had decided in more details to rummage in materials on geology of the Moon. And the time expended on it had not gone to waste. The works of scientists of Planetary Science Institute (NASA, the USA) and Brown's University (Brown University, the USA) under the direction of professor Peter H.Schults had caught my eye.
They concentrated their investigations on lunar mounts of volcanic origin in Ina area about 3 km in length and had established … that these mounts were formed from 1 to 10 million years ago. Professor Schultz and his staff assured that four more similar zones had been discovered on a lunar surface at least.
It was too much. All was so good fitted into just stated hypothesis, or, if to be more exact, into the legend about churning of the ocean (and here) that I was ready to believe in infallibility of all of about what I had written in the articles. But, fortunately, changed my mind in time.
After all, for certain, and equal age and composition of lunar and earthly rocks, and presence on Moon elements of relief similar to the Earth, and discovery of an ancient city on it different explorers will interpret variously. For certain, many of them will discover in it the participation of alien reason. Though, for what reason, on the Moon? On the dead, lifeless planet?
Well here, now, apparently, had come the time to tell you about what thoughts rolled in my head still before I had switched on the TV set.
Found out on the Moon by Soviet and American automatic stations and astronauts rocks having age 4-4,5 billion years, similar on composition to Earth's basalts, and thickness of the lunar crust
(60-100 km), comparable to thickness of ancient continental platforms on Earth, speak about the following. If the Moon was really a part of Earth, it belonged to an ancient continental platform. The legend about charning of the ocean strictly localises a
position of this platform by the northern polar latitudes. But earlier there was Hyperborea here populated being on the highest level of development, Adityas!
Means, the presence on the Moon "ruins of cities, huge spheric objects from glass" and even "stone towers and castles which hover in the air" is not groundless. All it can be miraculously remained on the satellite of Earth surface the remains of ancient legendary Hyperborea!
Especially strike imagination the objects from "glass", ostensibly found out on the Moon. After all, you, probably, have not fogotten yet the legend about Inis Vitrin or Glass island in the North - the stronghold of the mysterious
civilization of Fomorians. Probably, this type of architectural buildings had been inherited by them from more ancient times. That times which were concerned of bloom of Hyperborea.
Possible presence of a part of Hyperborea on the Moon allows to perceive much better the most complicated tectonic structure of the bed of the Arctic ocean and to discover answers to many questions with which almost each explorer collides at trying to reconstruct the history of evolution of this region. I never could get rid of the thought that in the stone chronicle (annals) of this part of the Earth the whole chapters were skipped. And just now it becomes clear for me where there can be their new storehouse.
Specialists on space geology can raise objections to me. Their arguments will be approximately the following. If the Moon and was a part of Earth its separation from it had occured still in the Precambrian times. Otherwise it is impossible to explain the availability of such bulks of craters on it, on density of which the age of planets is usually determined. Besides, if the Moon had been torn off from Earth, it should melt completely at first and only then to gain a ball form.
Undoubtedly, it is so. But only in that case if the average probability of impact of planets with asteroids is taken into consideration and formation of celestial bodies from a gas-dust cloud is considered. And if under the influence of huge attractive force (gravitation) of Earth existing at the initial stage of separation from it of a big piece, which afterwards became the Moon, there was its partial melting, and large blocks of strongest rocks were remained on the Moon which were retained on its surface like to block of ice on the ocean surface or to orange peels in a jam. And if
other numerous pieces collided with the Moon, which have been torn off from Earth together with it, and at first they were satellites of the Moon, and fell (dropped) on its surface at reaching by them of the Roche limit, forming thus craters and new ridges which had partially sticked in a semiharden lunar crust. And if a part of lunar craters was formed on Earth during wars between Adityas with Daityas and Danavas and are the tracks from explosions of nuclear and other shells … And anything may else can be.
In a word, the determination of young elements of relief on the Moon is very important argument in favour of its recent tearing off from the Earth.
And concentration of the major portion of "seas" on a part of the Moon looking at the Earth as if confirms that development of the Moon occured at first like development of the satellite of Jupiter Io when under influence of strongest gravitation of Earth looking at it rocks were melted in the first turn.
The Middle Miocene Moon, should be, represented a surprising show. At first hardly raised over horizon and calling horror the igneous bubbling medley (mass), sparging melted stone drips in air and on land. Then standing low over horizon the fascinating glowing disk in several times exceeding the sun. In process of "rotation" ("run-up") of Earth, it appeared in the sky more and more frequently, perhaps, in several hours after its setting for horizon.
It all the time seems to me standing in night silence, lighted by light of that supernatural moon, surprising gigantic multiarm and many-headed creatures which populated our planet in those far times. According to legends, many of them conducted a nocturnalism. And maybe, shining on the night sky even large, as well as they, the moon was the important element in their life. Perhaps, they prayed it. Probably, she added forces to them. Perhaps, she cloud their reason, and they became possessed and seized by unique desire to discover a victim to the night godhood.
Whether all it was really so, to establish difficultly enough. Though, in my opinion, creation of the Moon in the Middle Miocene and beginning its rotation (ran-up) explains very well appearence on our planet of Rakshasas, Nirritis, Bhutas, Pishschas, Yakshas and other demonic beings which had gigantic sizes (more than 10 m). I pronounced the supposition earlier that the first signs of their presence on Earth appeared in the end of the Oligocene or Neogene but then my arguments were supported by nothing. Now they have received more powerful foundation.
© A.V. Koltypin, 2009
I, A. Koltypin the author and translator of this work give permission to use this for any purpose except prohibited by applicable law, on condition that my authorship and hyperlink to the site http://earthbeforeflood.com is given.
When this material has long been written, I was sent a curious article summarizing the drilling of the Kola super-deep borehole, "Telescope to the underworld", published in the magazine "Secrets of the XX century" in September, 2010. Here's an excerpt from it: "It is impossible not to mention the opening made in the comparison of the lunar soil brought by Soviet space station in the late 70's from the surface of the Moon, and samples taken at the Kola borehole at a depth of 3 kilometers. It turned out these samples are similar as two peas. Some astronomers saw this as evidence that the Moon was once broke away from Earth as a result of a cataclysm"
Read my works "Legends and hypotheses about a lunar rabbit, churning of the ocean, spinning up of the firmament (vault of heaven), origin of the Moon and connection of the Moon with death and immortality - the description of catastrophes at the boundaries between the Third and Fourth and the Fourth and Fifth world epochs, acquisition of modern appearance by Earth and emergence of the modern person - Homo Sapiens", "The most important catastrophe in the history of Earth during which mankind appeared. When it happened?" and "Once again about the time of creation of the world and the biblical (Noachic) Flood. The amendments brought by geology and folklore"
Read also my works "The Seventh Continent - Hyperborea", "Where Hyperborea was and when did it exist?", "Svarga (Jambudvipa, Hyperborea). The world where gods lived" and other works on Hyperborea the links to which are in the work "Hyperborea - the northern native land of mankind"